Click Chemistry由K.Barry Sharpless、Hartmuth C.Kolb和M.G.Finn于2001年提出，用于描述快速選擇性反應或以可預測的方式相互“點擊”以形成具有雜原子鏈（C-X-C）的生理穩(wěn)定產物的反應。Click chemistry廣泛用于生物分子、表面、顆粒和有機化合物的改性，具有許多優(yōu)點1：

* 應用范圍廣泛；

* 模塊化性質；

* 在“小量”和“大量”反應中均適用；

* 反應條件溫和；

* 產品分離簡單（幾乎不需要純化）；

* 產率高，速度快；

* 無害副產品生成（遵循綠色化學的12項原則）；

* 兼容性良好，尤其在生命系統(tǒng)中（允許生物分子的化學選擇性修飾，幾乎不受干擾）2。

在大約10種不同類型的點擊反應中，有幾種是在各種生命科學應用中使用最頻繁，從“簡單”的生物分子標記和檢測到先進的CRISPER應用。在此，我們重點介紹最重要的9種（最新）應用：

* 生物分子標記與檢測

*（固&液相）生物分子修飾/連接

* 構建用于構效關系分析的類似物庫

* 藥物先導化合物發(fā)現(xiàn)

* 藥物輸送

* 材料優(yōu)化（聚合物改性）

* 病毒研究探針

* CRISPER sgRNA合成和靶基因標記

* 新應用，包括“點擊發(fā)布”

1.生物分子標記與檢測

Click chemistry十分有用的功能之一是它能夠標記和可視化生物分子，如脂質3、肽4、聚糖5、糖蛋白6、核酸和合成分子7,8（如紫杉醇9），并且具有最小的生理干擾性（體外和體內）10。在進行標記的兩步反應中，首先用雙正交點擊手柄（如炔烴或疊氮化物）標記目標生物分子（酶、代謝11,12或合成（請見圖1）9,13）。然后當一個分子上有熒光或親和基團的互補點擊手柄與目標分子發(fā)生點擊反應時，就會發(fā)生檢測/可視化。

Click chemistry應用生物分子標記與檢測13

例如，在活體發(fā)育的斑馬魚中，表面聚糖以亞細胞分辨率被觀察到；依靠基因編碼的傳統(tǒng)分子成像方法通常無法看見14。在這項研究中，Bertozzi等人將代謝糖工程與多色檢測策略相結合，以揭示細胞表面表達、細胞內運輸和整個斑馬魚胚胎發(fā)生過程中聚糖組織分布的差異。類似的研究也在小鼠中進行，以跟蹤移植細胞和測定細胞對肽的攝取情況，這有助于結構-活性-通透性關系優(yōu)化研究15。兩個位點標記生物分子（稱為雙位點標記）有效的促進了復雜生物系統(tǒng)的研究16,17,18,19,20。

2.(固相和液相）生物分子修飾/連接

肽、核苷酸、小分子、超分子等都可以通過固相或液相點擊化學進行修飾，幾乎無需使用保護基團，也無需產品純化3,21,22?？傮w來講，固相合成更快，且需要更少的后處理，但是每種方法都各有優(yōu)缺點23,24。

3. 類似物庫的建設

類似物庫可以通過點擊化學快速可靠地構建，無需太多的合成工作，然后通過原位高通量篩選（HTS）來促進分子結構-活性關系（SAR）分析，這是優(yōu)化和發(fā)現(xiàn)生物活性分子所必需的。已經有許多基于click（三唑）骨架的片段庫（聚焦組合）通過此方法被構建出來25，例如Janus激酶抑制劑ruxolitinib衍生的三唑文庫，它被用來評估JAK3抑制劑24 。

4. 用于先導化合物發(fā)現(xiàn)的原位點擊化學

原位點擊化學是一種（動力學）靶點導向合成方法，Sharpless及其同事于2002年第一次提出并應用于發(fā)現(xiàn)一種有效的乙酰膽堿酯酶抑制劑26。這種方法使用目標生物分子本身作為支架，如果使其足夠接近并以適當?shù)姆较蚍磻?，則結合配體在其上進行咔噠反應。通過這種方式，可以從帶有互補反應性官能團的片段庫中篩選出能夠與目標物形成穩(wěn)定絡合物的最佳配體27。無需事先對文庫成員進行合成、純化和生化評估，即可快速且經濟高效地篩選大量化合物28,29。

碳酸酐酶30、HIV蛋白酶31、幾丁酶32、核苷酸配體33、蛋白質-蛋白質相互作用（通過磺基點擊化學）34、抗體樣蛋白質捕獲劑35,36、轉錄因子37、通道38等的抑制劑也已被表征。

5. 藥物輸送

藥物進入人體的控制給藥是有效藥物設計的一個重要方面。點擊化學已用于構建聚合物納米和微粒藥物遞送系統(tǒng)（DDS），如聚合物膠束、脂質體、膠囊、碳納米管等6,39。

6. 材料優(yōu)化（聚合物改性）

在材料制造領域，從線性聚合物和接枝聚合物到更復雜結構（如星形聚合物、嵌段共聚物和樹狀聚合物）的合成，再到表面和界面的功能化40，點擊化學都產生了巨大的影響。例如，由于不產生小分子副產物，點擊化學可以最大限度地減少氣泡、空穴和不規(guī)則的形成，就像其他縮聚反應一樣，這些氣泡、空穴和不規(guī)則會破壞新合成熱固性材料的外觀和性能41。

CuAAC click chemistry還被用作一種高效、環(huán)保的交聯(lián)策略，以改善適用于涂料和粘合劑的水性聚合物的性能42（下圖2）。廣泛適用于聚氨酯（WPU）、聚酯分散體（PED）和聚丙烯酸酯乳液（PAE），該策略優(yōu)于其他可用的交聯(lián)策略（包括基于N-羥甲基丙烯酰胺（NMA）、懸垂乙酰乙酸基團和可逆酮酰肼反應的自交聯(lián)系統(tǒng)）。Click交聯(lián)聚合物薄膜的機械強度、硬度和耐水/溶劑性能顯著提高，為工業(yè)涂料應用中使用硬化劑提供了一種有可能降低成本的替代品。

Formation of click cross-linked waterborne polymers42

此外，各種（1D、2D、3D）生物材料（如水凝膠）的合成在組織工程43,44,45,46再生醫(yī)學47、藥物輸送48和基因治療領域49也越來越受到重視。

7. 病毒研究探針

在過去幾十年中50，與病毒相關的研究，包括病毒（蛋白質、核酸或病毒粒子）追蹤51,52、抗病毒設計53,54、診斷55,56,57和基于病毒的傳遞系統(tǒng)58,59都使用了點擊化學。例如，通過將疊氮化物修飾的病毒粒子連接到由二苯并環(huán)辛烯（DBCO）衍生的量子點（QD），使用無銅點擊反應來標記包膜病毒（痘苗病毒（VACV）和A病毒（H9N2））。標記效率達到80%以上，不干擾病毒的感染能力，熒光強度足以實現(xiàn)單個病毒粒子的跟蹤60。

8. CRISPER-sgRNA合成與靶基因標記

Click chemistry現(xiàn)在可以在CRISPR工具箱中找到合成單個或多個單一導向RNA（sgRNA）的位置，繞過了與（更長）寡聚體長度相關的現(xiàn)有合成限制，并縮短sgRNA設計和應用之間的時間。

Click chemistry（被稱為“分裂和點擊”）不是一次性制造整個sgRNA，而是簡單地連接兩個更小（更容易合成）的片段：一個按需制備的高純度~20-mer（crRNA）靶向序列和一個通用的可大規(guī)模生產的79-mer CRISPR內切酶蛋白（Cas9）序列（tracrRNA）。結果發(fā)現(xiàn)，帶有三唑鍵的~99-聚體能夠在體外和細胞內有效地進行Cas9介導的DNA切割，其靶向性與體外轉錄的sgRNA相當61。

點擊化學也被用于標記靶基因（稱為sgRNA點擊（sgR CLK））62。該技術包括在體外轉錄的CRISPR-sgRNA的3′端安裝點擊手柄，以形成疊氮化物標記的三元復合物（由dCas9、sgRNA和靶基因組成）。然后通過與炔烴對應物的點擊反應實現(xiàn)該三元絡合物的功能化。

此外，點擊化學還用于設計一種柔性樹枝狀聚合物，用于傳遞鋅指、TALEs和CRISPR/dCas9平臺。使用該方法具有高轉染效率和較大的處理量63。

9. 包括“點擊發(fā)布”的新應用

除了連接，點擊化學現(xiàn)在正在探索解封或“點擊釋放”應用，這使得探針激活和治療傳遞的新策略成為可能64,65,66。例如，利用逆電子需求Diels-Alder-噠嗪消除反應在體外和腫瘤小鼠中激發(fā)阿霉素從抗體-藥物結合物（ADC）中的快速釋放67。

點擊化學還被用于開發(fā)新的的微芯片和毛細管系統(tǒng)68，如微流控“點擊芯片”69和基于石墨烯的“點擊芯片”70。此外，“電點擊”接合方法已被用于固定酶（用于生物傳感器）、制備電化學免疫傳感器以及在空間和時間上控制蛋白質接合71,72,73。

參考文獻

1. Sharpless et al. (2001) Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40(11): 2004-2021.

2. Liu, B., Kenry. (2019) Bio-orthogonal Click Chemistry for In Vivo Bioimaging. Trends in Chemistry 1(8): 763-778.

3. Best, M. D., et al. (2019) Labeling of phosphatidylinositol lipid products in cells through metabolic engineering by using a clickable myo-inositol probe. Chembiochem 20(2): 172-180.

4. Li, H., Aneja, R., Chaiken, I. (2013) Click Chemistry in Peptide-Based Drug Design. Molecules 18(8): 9797-9817.

5. Prescher, J. A., Dube, D. H., Bertozzi, C. R. (2004) Chemical remodelling of cell surface in living animals. Nature 430: 873–877.

6. Agnew B. et al. (2011) Metabolic Labeling and Click Chemistry Detection of Glycoprotein Markers of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation. In: Vemuri M., Chase L., Rao M. (eds) Mesenchymal Stem Cell Assays and Applications. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), vol 698. Humana Press.

7. Fantoni, N. F., El-Sagheer, A. H., Brown, T. (2021) A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Click Chemistry with Nucleic Acids. Chemical Reviews Article ASAP.

8. Das, S. R., Paredes, E. (2010) Click Chemistry for Rapid Labeling and Ligation of RNA. ChemBioChem 12(1): 125-131.

9. Lei, X. et al. (2013) A Bioorthogonal Ligation Enabled by Click Cycloaddition of o-Quinolinone Quinone Methide and Vinyl Thioether. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(13): 4996-4999.

10. Takayama, Y., Kusamori, K., Nishikawa, M. (2019) Click Chemistry as a Tool for Cell Engineering and Drug Delivery. Molecules 24(1):172.

11. Salic, A., Mitchison, T. J. (2008) A Chemical Method for Fast and Sensitive Detection of DNA Synthesis in Vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 2415-2420.

12. Neef, A. B., Luedtke, N. W. (2011) Dynamic Metabolic Labeling of DNA in Vivo with Arabinosyl Nucleosides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 20404-20409.

13. Pickens, C. J. et al. (2018) Practical Considerations, Challenges, and Limitations of Bioconjugation via Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition. Bioconjugate Chem. 29(3): 686-701.

14. Bertozzi, C. R. (2008) In vivo imaging of membrane-associated glycans in developing zebrafish. Science 320(5876): 664-667.

15. Partridge, A. W. et al. (2021) NanoClick: A High Throughput, Target-Agnostic Peptide Cell Permeability Assay. ACS Chem. Biol. 16(2): 293-309.

16. Devaraj, N. K. et al. (2013) Fluorescent live-cell imaging of metabolically incorporated unnatural cyclopropene-mannosamine derivatives. ChemBioChem 14: 205-208.

17. Lemke, E. A. (2014) Minimal tags for rapid dual-color live-cell labeling and super-resolution microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 53(8): 2245–2249.

18. Zhang, X. et al. (2015) Second generation TQ-ligation for cell organelle imaging. ACS Chem. Biol. 10: 1676-1683.

19. Chin, J. W. et al. (2014) Concerted, rapid, quantitative, and site-specific dual labeling of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136: 7785-7788.

20. Xie, H. Y. (2017) Integrating two efficient and specific bioorthogonal ligation reactions with natural metabolic incorporation in one cell for virus dual labeling. Anal. Chem. 89(21): 11620-11627.

21. Castro, V., Rodriguez, H., Albericio, F. (2016) CuAAC: An Efficient Click Chemistry Reaction on Solid Phase. ACS Comb. Sci. 18(1): 1-14.

22. Gehringer, M., Forster, M., Laufer, S. A. (2015) Solution-Phase Parallel Synthesis of Ruxolitinib-Derived Janus Kinase Inhibitors via Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition. ACS Comb. Sci. 17(1): 5-10.

23. Chang, Y-T. et al. (2011) Solid phase combinatorial synthesis of a xanthone library using click chemistry and its application to an embryonic stem cell probe. Chem. Commun. 47: 7488-7490.

24. Meier, M. A. R. et al. (2019) Direct comparison of solution and solid phase synthesis of sequence-defined macromolecules. Polym. Chem. 10: 3859-3867.

25. Zhan, P. et al. (2016) Discovery of bioactive molecules from CuAAC click-chemistry-based combinatorial libraries. Drug Discovery Today 21(1): 118-132.

26. Sharpless, K. B. et. al. (2002) Click Chemistry in Situ: Acetylcholinesterase as a Reaction Vessel for the Selective Assembly of a Femtomolar Inhibitor from an Array of Building Blocks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 41, 1053– 1057.

27. Oueis, E., Sabot, C., Renard, P.-Y. (2015) New insights into the kinetic target-guided synthesis of protein ligands. Chem. Commun. 51: 12158-12169.

28. Hirsch, A. K. H. et al. (2018) Druggability Assessment of Targets Used in Kinetic Target-Guided Synthesis. J. Med. Chem. 61(21): 9395-9409.

29. Kolb, H. C. et al. (2004) In Situ Click Chemistry: Enzyme Inhibitors Made to Their Own Specifications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126(40): 12809-12818.

30. Kolb, H. C. et al. (2005) In Situ Click Chemistry: Enzyme-Generated Inhibitors of Carbon Anhydrase II. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44(1): 116-120.

31. Fokin, V. V. et al. (2006) Inhibitors of HIV‐1 Protease by Using In Situ Click Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45(9): 1435-1439.

32. Hirose T, Sunazuka T, Omura S. (2010) Recent development of two chitinase inhibitors, Argifin and Argadin, produced by soil microorganisms. Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences 86(2):85-102.

33. Dervan, P. B., Poulin-Kerstien, A. T. (2003) DNA-Templated Dimerization of Hairpin Polyamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125(51): 15811-15821.

34. Manetsch, R. (2011) Screening of protein-protein interaction modulators via sulfo-click kinetic target-guided synthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 6(7): 724–732.

35. Heath, J. R. (2009) Iterative in situ click chemistry creates antibody-like protein-capture agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48(27): 4944-4948.

36. Heath, J. R. et al. (2013) In situ click chemistry: from small molecule discovery to synthetic antibodies. Integr. Biol. 5(1): 87-95.

37. Deprez, B et al. (2010) Exploring Drug Target Flexibility Using in Situ Click Chemistry: Application to a Mycobacterial Transcriptional Regulator. ACS Chem. Biol. 5: 1007-1013.

38. Fokin, V. V. et al. (2012) Generation of Candidate Ligands for Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Via in Situ Click Chemistry with a Soluble Acetylcholine Binding Protein Template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134: 6732-6740.

39. Fernandez-Megia, E. et al. (2012) Click Chemistry for Drug Delivery Nanosystems. Pharm. Res. 29: 1-34.

40. List-Kratochvil, E. J. W. et al. (2020) Utilizing Diels-Alder “click” chemistry to functionalize the organic-organic interface of semiconducting polymers. J. Mater. Chem. C. 8: 3302.

41. Serra, À. et al. (2020) The Use of Click-Type Reactions in the Preparation of Thermosets. Polymers 12(5):1084.

42. Yang, J. et al. (2016) Click Cross-Linking-Improved Waterborne Polymers for Environment-Friendly Coatings and Adhesives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(27): 17499-17510.

43. DeForest, C. A., Anseth, K. S. (2011) Cytocompatible click-based hydrogels with dynamically tunable properties through orthogonal photoconjugation and photocleavage reactions. Nat. Chem. 3(12): 925-931.

44. Becker, M. L. et al. (2013) Postelectrospinning “click” modification of degradable amino acid-based poly (ester urea) nanofibers. Macromolecules, 46(24): 9515-9525

45. Chen, H.-Y. et al. (2016) Multifaceted and route-controlled “click” reactions based on vapor-deposited coatings. Biomater. Sci. 4(2): 265-271.

46. Xu, Z., Bratlie, K. M. (2018) Click Chemistry and Material Selection for in Situ Fabrication of Hydrogels in Tissue Engineering Applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4(7): 2276-2291.

47. Shi, L. et al. (2021) Click chemistry-based biopolymeric hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Biomedical materials 16(2): 022003.

48. Fu, Q. et al. (2017) Clickable and imageable multiblock polymer micelles with magnetically guided and PEG-switched targeting and release property for precise tumor theranosis. Biomaterials 145: 138-153.

49. Lin, C. et al. (2020) Bioreducible crosslinked cationic nanopolyplexes from clickable polyethylenimines enabling robust cancer gene therapy. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine 24: 102144.

50. Ren, L. et al. (2018) Recent trends in click chemistry as a promising technology for virus-related research. Virus research 256: 21–28.

51. de Haan, C. A. et al. (2012) Visualizing coronavirus RNA synthesis in time by using click chemistry. Journal of virology 86(10): 5808–5816.

52. Kalveram B, Lihoradova O, Indran SV, Head JA, Ikegami T. (2013) Using click chemistry to measure the effect of viral infection on host-cell RNA synthesis. Journal of Visualized Experiments: Jove.

53. Miura Y. et al. (2017) Design of glycopolymers carrying sialyl oligosaccharides for controlling the interaction with the influenza virus. Biomacromolecules 18(12):4385–4392.

54. Wang, C., Zhu, W., Wang, B.Z. (2017) Dual-linker gold nanoparticles as adjuvanting carriers for m*lent display of recombinant influenza hemagglutinin trimers and flagellin improve the immunological responses in vivo and in vitro. Int. J. Nanomed. 12: 4747-4762.

55. Donolato, M. et al. (2015) Quantification of NS1 dengue biomarker in serum via optomagnetic nanocluster detection. Scientific Reports 5: 16145.

56. Samitier J. et al. (2015) Label-free electrochemical DNA sensor using "click"-functionalized PEDOT electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 74:751-756.

57. Carell, T. et al. (2020) Supersensitive Multifluorophore RNA-FISH for Early Virus Detection and Flow-FISH by Using Click Chemistry. ChemBioChem 21(15): 2214-2218.

58. Iyer, K. S. et al. (2017) Synthetically controlling dendrimer flexibility improves delivery of large plasmid DNA. Chemical science 8(4): 2923–2930.

59. Chu, Y., Oum, Y. H., Carrico, I. S. (2016) Surface modification via strain-promoted click reaction facilitates targeted lentiviral transduction. Virology 487: 95–103.

60. Xie, H. et al. (2012) A Mild and Reliable Method to Label Enveloped Virus with Quantum Dots by Copper-Free Click Chemistry. Analytical chemistry 84: 8364-8370.

61. Brown, T. et al. (2019) An artificial triazole backbone linkage provides a split-and-click strategy to bioactive chemically modified CRISPR sgRNA. Nat Commun 10: 1610.

62. Srivatsan, S. G. et al. (2020) Terminal Uridylyl Transferase Mediated Site-Directed Access to Clickable Chromatin Employing CRISPR-dCas9. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(32): 13954-13965.

63. Iyer, K. S. et al. (2017) Synthetically controlling dendrimer flexibility improves delivery of large plasmid DNA. Chemical science 8(4): 2923–2930.

64. Carlson, J. C. T., Mikula, H., Weissleder, R. (2018) Unraveling Tetrazine-Triggered Bioorthogonal Elimination Enables Chemical Tools for Ultrafast Release and Universal Cleavage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(10): 3603-3612.

65. Royzen, M. et al. (2016) In Vivo Bioorthogonal Chemistry Enables Local Hydrogel and Systemic Pro-Drug To Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma. ACS Cent. Sci. 2(7): 476-482.

66. Peplow, M. (2019) Click chemistry targets antibody-drug conjugates for the clinic. Nature Biotechnology 37: 835-837.

67. Robillard, M. S. et al. (2016) Triggered Drug Release from an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Using Fast “Click-to-Release” Chemistry in Mice. Bioconjugate Chem. 27(7): 1697-1706.

68. Chen, C. et al. (2019) Click chemistry at the microscale. Analyst 144: 1492-1512.

69. Reichert, D. E. et al. (2015) Development of a microfluidic “click chip” incorporating an immobilized Cu(I) catalyst. RSC Adv. 5: 6142-6150.

70. Aran, K. et al. (2018) Graphene-based biosensor for on-chip detection of bio-orthogonally labeled proteins to identify the circulating biomarkers of aging during heterochronic parabiosis. Lab Chip 18: 3230-3238.

71. Pingarrón, J. M. et al. (2020) Design of electrochemical immunosensors using electro-click chemistry. Application to the detection of IL-1β cytokine in saliva. Bioelectrochemistry 133: 107484.

72. Ono, T. et al. (2019) Enzyme immobilization in completely packaged freestanding SU-8 microfluidic channel by electro click chemistry for compact thermal biosensor. Process Biochemistry 79: 57-64.

73. Shi, X-W. et al. (2013) Protein addressing on patterned microchip by coupling chitosan electrodeposition and ‘electro-click’ chemistry. Biofabrication 5(4): 041001.